Thank goodness these poor dogs have been helped, finally.
What I can't understand is that woman has a history of animal neglect, and yet she was allowed to go on with so many dogs.
I think it might be because the criteria for animal care isn't tough enough. And a certain 'line' has to be overstepped before authorities will intervene.
And considering the circumstance, how dare the woman try to appeal, on the grounds that the capture was 'illegally done'? How dare she try to make use of legal loopholes, when the welfare of so many dogs was the main issue?
Sometimes there are cases of animal hoarders who, in their own minds are trying to run a 'rescue' but get out of their depth. But if they really cared, the health and safety of their charges must come first.
What I can't understand is that woman has a history of animal neglect, and yet she was allowed to go on with so many dogs.
I think it might be because the criteria for animal care isn't tough enough. And a certain 'line' has to be overstepped before authorities will intervene.
And considering the circumstance, how dare the woman try to appeal, on the grounds that the capture was 'illegally done'? How dare she try to make use of legal loopholes, when the welfare of so many dogs was the main issue?
Sometimes there are cases of animal hoarders who, in their own minds are trying to run a 'rescue' but get out of their depth. But if they really cared, the health and safety of their charges must come first.
