09-20-2015, 05:07 PM
This is a scandalous situation. The RSPCA was right to seize the horses. However, even though there were people wanting to take the horses, they shot them. Former owners of the horses wanted them back, but they were not given a chance.
http://news.google.ca/news/url?sr=1&ct2=...t=2&at=dt0
The thing is, the horses were shot so soon after being seized that they were not properly evaluated. Someone made a decision to get rid of them. They never stood a chance once they fell into the hands of the RSPCA. It makes you wonder who is the abuser. At least, even though they were neglected, their former owner let them live.
One has to wonder if the RSPCA even remembers why it was founded in the first place.
http://news.google.ca/news/url?sr=1&ct2=...t=2&at=dt0
The thing is, the horses were shot so soon after being seized that they were not properly evaluated. Someone made a decision to get rid of them. They never stood a chance once they fell into the hands of the RSPCA. It makes you wonder who is the abuser. At least, even though they were neglected, their former owner let them live.
One has to wonder if the RSPCA even remembers why it was founded in the first place.
![[Image: IMG_9091.JPG]](https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-rtQnRVnpHuw/Upv4HXYM20I/AAAAAAAAAqo/K5MmSTvkZdA/w296-h229-p-no/IMG_9091.JPG)
Catherine
