I came across an article that brings up the idea of property right for wild animals. Before a developer could wipe out a habitat the rights of the animals living there would have to be considered.
http://news.google.ca/news/url?sr=1&ct2=...t=2&at=dt0
It is a radical concept, but when you think about it, it makes a lot of sense. We can't go on destroying habitats without wiping out species. We don't have the right to wipe out a species. So therefore it follows that we don't have the right to do the things that will wipe out a species.
What do you think?
http://news.google.ca/news/url?sr=1&ct2=...t=2&at=dt0
It is a radical concept, but when you think about it, it makes a lot of sense. We can't go on destroying habitats without wiping out species. We don't have the right to wipe out a species. So therefore it follows that we don't have the right to do the things that will wipe out a species.
What do you think?
![[Image: IMG_9091.JPG]](https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-rtQnRVnpHuw/Upv4HXYM20I/AAAAAAAAAqo/K5MmSTvkZdA/w296-h229-p-no/IMG_9091.JPG)
Catherine
