11-15-2017, 03:51 AM
That is a sad outcome, and very disappointing.
If the animals were not in an ideal circumstance where they were, then they could have been re-located to an animal sanctuary, "petting zoo", or adopted by someone suitable.
But instead, the harsh option was used....
Why?
Presumably because it would have cost someone something to have worked harder to help these animals. Or it is a result of robotic thinking and the inability or unwillingness to think a little bit laterally?
If the animals were not in an ideal circumstance where they were, then they could have been re-located to an animal sanctuary, "petting zoo", or adopted by someone suitable.
But instead, the harsh option was used....
Why?
Presumably because it would have cost someone something to have worked harder to help these animals. Or it is a result of robotic thinking and the inability or unwillingness to think a little bit laterally?
