05-04-2018, 05:29 PM
There are a lot of unanswered questions here, such as:
If the bank was going to foreclose on the loan, why was the ex-husband of the deceased lady on the property at all?
As an ex-spouse not living on the property, why did he take it on himself to dispose of the horses without permission?
Why was he willing to pay for the transportation to the slaughter house, which must have cost nearly the same as the money he received for the horse meat?
Yes, ownership should have been verified by the slaughter house. Do horses have to be microchipped and/ or ear-tagged in Canada, Catherine? In most countries, especially in Europe, the microchip or ear-tag is compulsory. That means the owner can be verified on a computer in seconds. A mere declaration that one is the "owner" is not sufficient.
If the bank was going to foreclose on the loan, why was the ex-husband of the deceased lady on the property at all?
As an ex-spouse not living on the property, why did he take it on himself to dispose of the horses without permission?
Why was he willing to pay for the transportation to the slaughter house, which must have cost nearly the same as the money he received for the horse meat?
Yes, ownership should have been verified by the slaughter house. Do horses have to be microchipped and/ or ear-tagged in Canada, Catherine? In most countries, especially in Europe, the microchip or ear-tag is compulsory. That means the owner can be verified on a computer in seconds. A mere declaration that one is the "owner" is not sufficient.
