03-12-2015, 08:17 AM
Yes, something about the timing wasn't making sense to me either. I thought -if he ate the meat at Cruft's, and it was many hours later, and back in Belgium when he fell suddenly ill, then why such a long delay? And why did the post mortem still find meat in his stomach in a pretty intact condition, after all those hours? Usually by that time it wouldn't still be in the stomach.
Then just now I found this:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...-show.html
The vet now thinks he probably wasn't poisoned at Crufts. And the meat contained some small black pellets commonly used in agriculture as a pesticide.
Then just now I found this:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...-show.html
The vet now thinks he probably wasn't poisoned at Crufts. And the meat contained some small black pellets commonly used in agriculture as a pesticide.